This is just for fun. I found this on Techcrunch. I went and took the quiz. Here are my results.
Your results:
You are Iron Man
Inventor. Businessman. Genius.
Iron Man: 80%
Green Lantern: 80%
Superman: 65%
Spider-Man: 60%
Hulk: 60%
Catwoman: 55%
The Flash: 55%
Supergirl: 52%
Batman: 45%
Wonder Woman: 37%
Robin: 29%
I’ve been reading a lot of stories lately about platforms. Microsoft is preparing for its big consumer launch of Vista. Apple is slowly reminding us that Leopard is on it’s way. The operating system wars have continued for years – but, there seems to be something different going on.
I keep hearing about people switching to the Mac. It started with all of my friends and family. Then I started seeing more and more MacBook Pros around the office. When I would go to user conferences I’d see more and more presenters and attendees using Mac laptops. Yet another friend emailed me this morning asking if I thought he should switch to a MacBook. Now I’m seeing a lot of the influential bloggers talking about buying MacBook Pros (Thomas Hawk, Robert Scoble, Om Malik, to name a few).
I’ve been a dual-platform guy for the last seven years that I’ve been at Macromedia/Adobe, but my primary machine was always a PC. I always felt drawn to the Mac but the realities of my work prevented me from doing so full-time. When I was an evangelist I couldn’t use a Mac full-time because it couldn’t run all of the servers that I needed for demo purposes (no longer true). When I moved to product management, I found myself a slave to Outlook and OneNote. Sure, there were Mac alternatives but none that were nearly as good. Being on an Exchange server limits your options – if calendaring is important to you (Entourage sucks!).
The big event that changed it all for me and most of the people I know was the move to the Intel platform and resulting capability to run Windows inside Mac OS X via virtual machines like Parallels. Apple also introduced BootCamp, which allowed users to install Windows on their Macs using a boot manager. I never bothered with that because I only really needed Windows for running Office (mostly Outlook and PowerPoint) and doing an occasional demo of the Windows version of Flash – which Parallels is ideal for.
Once the Intel-based MacBook Pros came out and I was able to get Parallels up and running I placed my Thinkpad T43p in it’s docking station, locked it up, and didn’t touch it for about six months. It wasn’t until two weeks ago that I decided to fire it up and install Windows Vista on it. I figured I should get familiar with Vista and I knew that I’d have to show off our software running (quite nicely) on Vista – and it doesn’t run so well in Parallels, due to the lack of hardware acceleration (meaning I’d miss all of the pretty Aero UI in Vista).
After kicking the tires with Windows Vista for a few weeks I must say that it’s pretty nice. They’ve added a lot of nice features. Of course a lot of stuff doesn’t work yet (like my VPN client) but that was expected. I like the new UI, application switching, and the improvements to the Windows Explorer. However, I’ve gotta say that I haven’t yet found anything that really blew me away. The little dashboard widget thing on the desktop never really did it for me – including Dashboard in Mac OS X.
It will be interesting to see how well Vista does in 2007. It seems to me that a key element will be whether any of the bazillions of PC manufacturers will ever get a clue and build better hardware. The closest thing to PC “sex appeal” has consistently came from Sony. Sure, there’s the Acer Ferrari notebooks and the brightly-colored AlienWare laptops, but they seem kind of gimicky and juvenile to me (though the AlienWare special edition Superman laptop is pretty cool, uh, and juvenile. :-). Not the sophisticated aesthetics that Apple does so well.
The platform wars will continue but I really think Apple’s made a lot of progress in 2006. My hope is that their momentum continues and we’ll all benefit from more diversity and options among PCs. The better Apple does, the harder Microsoft has to work to make Vista even better (and the opposite is true). In the end, we all benefit.
Of course, the more diversity among operating systems, the more important it will be for developers to have access to a cross-platform run-time that allows them to build desktop applications using standard web technologies – while expecting a consistent user experience to all of their users, regardless of the platform that they choose…
(You were waiting for the connection back to Apollo, weren’t you? Hah!)
UPDATE: Heh. I just found this “review” of Vista by New York Times writer David Pogue. I hadn’t noticed the things that he points out, but he has a point. Of course, keep in mind that Pogue has been a long-time Macintosh zealot, so his point-of-view is a bit biased.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT6YO30GhmQ
We finally got my old position (well, my future old position, as soon as it gets filled) posted on our jobs site. Though we’ve identified several strong candidates internally, we’re very interested in interviewing external candidates as well. This is a very important role so we want to make sure we find the best possible candidate.
Would you like to lead the planning for the next version of Flash? Would you like to help shape the future of the Flash business? Do you think you’d make a great spokesperson for the Flash platform? If so, visit our jobs site and apply online. Also, if you don’t think you meet the requirements outlined in the job posting but you still think you’d make a great product manager, I encourage you to go ahead and send in your resume. I’ve found that the ‘requirements’ in job postings like this are rarely very rigid.
Position Summary:
As a member of the Adobe Dynamic Media product management team, the Senior Product Manager for the Flash business is a key member of the team responsible for the business success of Flash and contributes strongly to the growth for the overall dynamic media business.
As part of the Flash Professional product management team this person’s responsibilities include determining the product roadmap, authoring the market and product requirement documents, managing the product lifecycle, and leading a cross-functional team to bring these features to market. The senior product manager is also responsible for the business success; guiding pricing, distribution, competitive positioning, representing the product to customers and press, and helping Flash drive growth for Production Studio and the broader creative tools business.
As a senior leader in the dynamic media business unit, this person will also be expected to contribute to the broader success of the business unit including playing an active role in strategy and business planning, and using their expertise in motion, interactivity and compositing to help develop new opportunities.
Knowledge & Skills:
The ideal candidate will have five or more years experience in the Flash marketplace and rich media product marketing. They should have an in-depth understanding of the Flash community, and be as comfortable describing ActionScript advantages as discussing designer workflows and approaches. They should understand the broad market opportunities for Flash, and have detailed knowledge of multiple segments that Flash is used in. An overall rich media, motion or video technology background and knowledge of mobile and device markets is a distinct advantage. Business management, pricing sales and marketing knowledge and experience highly valued.
Prior experience in software product management essential. Strong written and verbal communication skills. Must have a strong track record of successfully bringing products to market and working with cross functional teams. A BA/BS degree in a technical field or equivalent experience is required, and an MBA is preferred.
By the way, Adobe has been consistently rated among the top 20 companies (mostly recently number 13) in the country to work for. It’s a great place to work!
Since support for Ajax techniques is a very important component of the Apollo run-time, I’ve been spending a lot of my free time getting more familiar with Ajax. While digging around for good examples of Ajax at work, I found Kayak.com, a very cool “Web 2.0″ site that lets you search for flights, hotels, rental cars, etc. I could imagine a company like Kayak building a desktop app with Apollo that combines much of their existing functionality with tools for frequent travelers, including things that travelers may want access to while offline (on a flight, for example).
Kayak is a travel search engine. We help people like you find travel products from travel suppliers all over the world. This means a better travel search experience, more complete search results and best of all, savings for you every day. If you use Kayak for your travel planning, you are going to save time and money.
Kayak is an excellent example (some would say the poster child) for Web 2.0. We are considered a meta-search engine and that means our website searches hundreds of other websites in real time for the best travel deals available. Kayak lets you look at a full range of airlines, hotels and car rental agencies quickly and efficiently based on the exact criteria you select. We have put a lot of thought into the design of our website, and it has won accolades from consumers and the press alike (2006 Forbes Best of the Web for example) because of its simple, straightforward design and ease of use. Building a better travel search product is what we are about here at Kayak.
TIME.com has posted their list of the top 50 coolest websites.
How do we select our finalists? We evaluate hundreds of candidates—some suggested by readers, colleagues and friends, others discovered during countless hours of surfing. Many of this year’s choices are shining examples of Web 2.0: next-generation sites offering dynamic new ways to inform and entertain, sites with cutting-edge tools to create, consume, share or discuss all manners of media, from blog posts to video clips.
© 2012 mikedowney|blog · Proudly powered by WordPress & Green Park 2 by Cordobo.
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional | Valid CSS 3
